| Child
Welfare Test
Corrupt Documents Findings
A sheriff - Brian Kearney - who lead the enquiry
into the Orkney scandal (which cost £6 million)
made the following statement for child care policies
below. This sheriff also conducted the enquiry
into child care polices in Fife (27/10/92) - "We
must make sure frontline professionals have the
training, support, and confidence (we should add
proper vetting) to make well founded judgements
if that is what is best for a particular child
or young person."
Questions composed and addressed in Parliament:
[ Click
to here view insert... ]
[ Click
to here view insert... ]
The following are part of my experiences
of the child welfare test, with no written criteria
that any legal professional can direct me to.
There are
two systems in child welfare that people are
exposed to. There is The Herd Management System,
where you are threatened, intimidated/cajoled
(by the approval of the Justice 1 Committee)
to comply. Nothing dissimilar to an ASBO order
being placed upon you, which doesn't add up
to section (OCR r9.12).
[ Click
to here view insert... ]
The second system is
the flight or fright system, vulnerable information
relating to your children being exposed in an
open, public court setting, where there is every
chance in the world that a child sex offender
may be present, unknown to those involved in
the case being heard. The court cannot / will
not take active interest in vetting those attending
in the public galleries.
"If you don’t
comply, you will be held in contempt of court."
- (8 times I have had this thrown at me a part
of the welfare test.)
"You will just have
to re-live the past two years of abuse."
Unlawful entry into my
home to extract information from me, in front
of my children and family members.
Confidential information
being released to abusive pursuer, and my children
and I put at risk as a result. Also having to
be put on a 3-minute response alert by the local
police, to ensure our safety.
Unqualified, untrained,
and unvetted legal professionals forced into
my home.
Judicial decisions made
to protect the court and legal professionals,
when presented with documented evidence of corruption.
Messages from other guardians/parents,
referred by local MSP, being left on my telephone
answering machine. These guardians/parents filled
with fear, after having been intimidated into
complying by various agencies and professionals.
In the sheriff’s
judgement, which was seriously flawed, documented
evidence was omitted to protect the court. His
final veiled threat was “If that remains
the defenders position, there are ways and means
of dealing with her.” (This statement,
to me says it all, and confirms the intimidation
and corruption and veiled threats that my children
and I have been subjected to for the past 18
months.)
Have you ever asked yourself why the child welfare
courts are closed courts to the public and media?
We have to ask ourselves why the best interests
of children are represented in the same environment
as criminals and known child sex offenders.
I have protected my identity for obvious reasons,
and that of my children. Also, on this site, I
strongly advise that no real names are used when
registering and participating in the discussion
forum.
|
