| My
Story ~ One Woman's Voice ~ Page 13
As far as I was concerned this whole fiasco from
day one of this shameful system was flawed and
wrong. I was awarded (as stated in the letter
below) £750.00 compensation, from first
acting solicitor for 6 counts of professionally
inadequate service. I sent the lawyers the cheque
back, as I don’t want money.
The lawyers defence was, that he was under extreme
work pressure, and could not act competently on
my behalf. As you can see, I sent the money back.
I did not seek nor require the money. What I did
require was proper ethical representation for
my child, and stated that maybe the lawyer could
use the money better than me, and go on a stress
management course or a refresher course in the
practice of child welfare.
[ Click
to here view insert... ]
After the attack on me in court, the Scottish
Court Service was committed to acting on people’s
safety! They went to great lengths to provide
security in the court after failed promises as
stated in previous letters. They even put this
article in the local paper:
[ Click
to here view insert... ]
What they failed to mention was
that this security was only there on a trial basis,
and had only been in place for 3 weeks, and would
look good to the public that they had acted. But,
it was too little too late in my case.
In one of my conversations with the Scottish
Court Service, they stated that there was not
a demand for this service, interestingly the other
family who had been referred to me via the MSP
went through a very similar experience of being
threatened and put in a state of fear and alarm.
(The Scottish Court Service might like to see
the feedback this website gathers for people tortured
within this system, and act then if there is a
demand for effective security to be put in place
for people being a voice for their children.)
On letter dated below I wrote to the floating
sheriff, who sent Reporter X in to my house:
[ Click
to here view insert... ]
Here was the reply:
[ Click
to here view insert... ]
On one visit in Dec ‘06 to the court, a
new disclaimer had been put up in the civil office
of this court and stated that - “any information
given can not be guaranteed of the accuracy of
the information”. (There is no coincidence
that this was some sort of internal memo that
was sent to safeguard the Scottish Court Service,
as too much information was being unfolded as
to what was being allowed to operate within this
system. I was informed that the notice was always
there! My companion and I must have missed it!)
[ Click
to here view insert... ]
** Please observe the wording "THE
SCOTTISH COURT SERVICE AIMS NOT GURANTEES
peoples safety".
The only other contact I had with the police
force was 2 weeks before the sheriffs judgement
was due to come out. They wanted to follow up
the complaint of the attack. The insulting call
I took from the police, where he asked me if I
had the pursuer’s phone number, as he couldn’t
find it.
Why would I have the number of someone who had
a power of arrest placed on them, had a history
of harassment and violence against me, and 2 previous
police cautions for his behaviour toward me and
my children? I knew at this stage that this was
just another action of the court to try and tidy
up their mess. The pursuer was questioned under
caution yet again, and then let go. This was his
3rd caution, but it became evident in the sheriffs
judgement why the police came out to see me two
weeks before the judgement was released.
Back
- Next
[ 1
- 2 - 3
- 4 - 5
- 6 - 7
- 8 - 9
- 10 - 11
- 12 - 13
- 14 - 15
- 16 - 17
] |
