My Story ~ One Woman's Voice ~ Page 16

My Summation of My Case

I am a 110% qualified to state that the court allocated to deal with my case were unfit to do so. From the people, systems and operations that they allowed my family unit to be put at risk.

They had absolutely no regard for my child’s welfare or family unit. (And if anyone should have been held in contempt, they only had to look at there own steps.) They aided and abetted someone to continue with his harassment and abuse towards my children and I. All the interdicts and power of arrest and offload of data protected information happened throughout this dysfunctional process. They formed a bias opinion about me.

I wrote 44 letters to the court trying to get answers and possibly an apology. The sheriff attacked me personally in his judgement. The court chose to omit evidence. It was pretty evident from the judgement, that the sheriff had no background in child welfare proof cases. The court knew I was active in seeking answers about what risks they put me and my children at. They confused manipulation with challenging. My evidence was consistent and that of my witnesses. I have the transcript notes to clarify that the court tried to protect the floating sheriff’s actions and that of Reporter X, and even though they have intimidated and manipulated people in their actions for many years, they are not very good at what they do within this field.

Of all these so-called professionals that failed my child; the solicitor that was fined and found guilty as he was under work pressure; the independent non-bias reporters that conduct on-going investigations; the polices, documented failings and short comings and the courts ineffective security measures and total disregard for children and their guardians - and I am the process abuser? I firmly believe I am not the only person that is exposed to this inhumane torture within this system ( I am qualified to say I am not ) I have yet to observe a process, all I have observed is a mass of shameful dysfunction from so called professionals riding of the backs of children.

As for me having scant respect for authority, I have the highest respect for authority that is properly in place for people. None was ever demonstrated to me from this system.

The court was fully aware of what actions and answers I was seeking. I had no judicial decisions to hide behind, every action or investigation I was carrying out was out in the open and I am very confident that if the court had have been allowed, they would have punished me deeply and put my child/children’s lives at further risk

I question how credible people are within in the Scottish legal system from the admin staff, reporters, solicitors and sheriffs. (And be assured, I have heard some quotes within this system, such as "It is the pursuer’s solicitors job to control him." It’s quite a sad state of affairs that people think one human being should be controlled by another, but were in rooms debating that my child should be handed over to this person for contact, given that he needs to be controlled.)

In dealing with the paramount decisions of my child’s contact arrangements, I am appealing the sheriff’s judgement which will be heard in Aug 2007 (not in the court I was attacked in).

I will be the voice for my child, as common sense does not seem to prevail in the child welfare legal system. I have had to go to great lengths to ensure my safety is paramount within these buildings. I will never expose myself to being attacked again or put my children at risk.

All the agencies that failed me and my children had a duty of care to us; from the floating sheriff’s actions of putting someone into our home who was not qualified trained or vetted to undertake the task, to the solicitor who was fined for being under work pressure, to the police who were too busy to competently take the complaint of the attack that happened to me within the court, to the court services ineffective security system, to the independent non-biased reporter who put my family at risk due to her actions, to the sheriff who to my knowledge had only heard one other child welfare proof case, whom I believe had no prior knowledge of family Law, to the Justice 1 committee for allowing people to be threatened and intimated.

None of these systems had the paramount interests of my child in the forefront of there mind. I think the poem I composed to every child that has been exposed to this educated abuse, sums up everything.

Back - Next

[ 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 ]